Colorado Primary Ballot: Any Ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court Will “Legitimize” a Fraud!
The Colorado “primary election” is not an ELECTION. It is simply unconstitutional interference with the Republican presidential nomination process!
In their appeal of the Colorado Supreme Court decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, lawyers for Donald J. Trump write:
“The question presented is:
Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?”
The hysterical advocates of Critical Primary Theory have inflated the debate about primary BALLOT access to outrageously EXTREME interpretations!
Should the U.S. Supreme Court decide who can be on the “ballot” of a “Straw Poll”?
Some definitions:
“Election”noun, a formal choice by vote of a person for a public office.
“Nomination” noun, an official selection of someone as a candidate for public office.
Until the majority of the delegates to the Republican National Convention vote to nominate Mr. Trump, he is not eligible to be on the Presidential Election Ballot.
Thus, the question of whether or not Mr. Trump should be on the Presidential Election Ballot is not “ripe” for consideration by the Supreme Court.
Attempting to keep Mr. Trump off the Presidential Election Ballot by denying him access to a Colorado STRAW POLL is a creative initiative; but seriously flawed!
The Colorado presidential primary is, itself, an UNCONSTITUTIONAL interference with the internal affairs of the Republican Party since Colorado state law authorizes non-Republican voters to vote in the Republican presidential primary; a state law that conflicts with the Rules of the Republican Party.
(From the Colorado Secretary of State website: “Major parties are required to allow unaffiliated voters to vote in their primary election”.)
The U.S. Supreme Court has previously held that the: “First Amendment freedom to gather in association for the purpose of advancing shared beliefs is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from infringement by any State.”
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1980/79-1631
As used in the Republican presidential nomination process, “primaries” are not, on their face, UNCONSTITUTIONAL. (They are simply government sponsored public opinion surveys, or STRAW POLLS)
While many state laws providing for presidential primaries still use the term “presidential preference primaries”, the current media narrative universally omits the word “preference”.
The occupiers of the RNC are attempting to tie “voting” to the delegate election process by mandating delegate “binding” (voting) to the results of “primaries”.
What makes the “presidential primaries” UNCONSTITUTIONAL is the BIG REPUBLICAN PRIMARY LIE (delegate “binding”) which the current OCCUPIERS OF THE RNC distributed to the media with their “summary” of the delegate selection process.
In their media presentation, the RNC occupiers published:
“PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE VOTES. “IN 2024, 43 states will hold presidential primaries. Nine states will hold presidential preference caucuses….American Samoa and Michigan will adopt resolutions…regarding how delegates will be allocated and bound.
Illinois CD delegates will indicate the candidate to whom they intend to be bound before they are selected as delegates.
Guam, Montana, New Mexico, and South Dakota will not allocate delegates, and they will proceed to the national convention unbound.”
Then, the OCCUPIERS OF THE RNC formally make the primaries UNCONSTITUTIONAL with this: “Most states choose to hold a statewide vote that permits a choice among candidates for the Republican nomination…(and) statewide presidential preference votes must be used to allocate and bind the state’s delegation…”
Then, this little BOMBSHELL: “This requirement (binding) may also be waived by the (OCCUPIERS OF) RNC, and four states (Michigan, Montana, New Mexico, and South Dakota) have received such waivers for 2024”.
Which begs this question: Why and how did all of the remaining state parties decide they preferred to send ROBOTS to the national convention in place of Republicans?
The OCCUPIERS OF THE RNC have steadfastly refused to produce the DETAILED RULE 16 filings from the states for 2024, and also, ironically for 2020 as well!
The details in the Rule 16 filings contain the evidence the courts will need to review as they consider if THE COURTS CAN SAVE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
The OCCUPIERS OF THE RNC have no authority to dictate delegate“binding” to state parties!
For instance, it is those details that explain the overblown attention given to the Colorado primary “Ballot” access question.
The Colorado GOP Rule 16 filings will show that the Colorado Republican State Committee conspired with the RNC to create rules that:
“bind” delegates to vote according to primary results.
Allow non-Republicans to vote in the Republican presidential primary.
Allow candidates to hand-pick 60% of the Colorado delegation.
Here are a few immutable facts for consideration:
The Republican National Convention is the highest authority of the Republican Party.
The Republican Party is an unincorporated association that governs itself with Rules of Order adopted at the BEGINNING of each quadrennial convention. These Rules of the Republican Party govern the party UNTIL the next National Convention. The Republican Party has a four year life cycle.
The next Republican National Convention is set to convene in Milwaukee in July.
They most recent version of the Rules of the Republican Party was adopted at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in 2016.
Until the Republican National Convention adopts Rules of the Republican Party in July in Milwaukee, there are NO RULES to govern the 2024 Republican Presidential Nomination.
The Preamble to the Rules of the Republican Party explains how the Republican National Committee (a committee authorized by the convention) is created and authorized to manage the affairs of the party UNTIL the next Convention.
The current Preamble states: “BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the following be and hereby are adopted as The Rules of the Republican Party, composed of the rules for the election and government of the Republican National Committee UNTIL the next national convention, (2024) the rules under which delegates and alternate delegates shall be allotted to the respective states in the next national convention, and the rules under which such delegates shall be elected and under which contests shall be considered, and the rules of business of THIS (2016) national convention.”
The following post details how Rules confusion was intentionally created by the dishonest leadership of the Republican National Committee in the 1996/2000 cycle when they simply renumbered the Rules…
SUMMARY
The current wall to wall coverage of the 2024 Republican “horse race” for the Republican Presidential nomination GASLIGHTS that the Republican “field” of candidates has now been “winnowed” to four or five people, with the final winner of the race likely to be determined by March 15.
That is the Progressive Model of the Republican presidential nomination process; a “horse race” with a single “winner” who will become the “presumptive nominee” of the party long before the Republican National Convention.
The Progressive Model allows no consideration of the FACT that the Republican National Convention is FREE to nominate someone who not even entered any primaries!
The Progressive Republicans in the RNC have conspired with the Progressive media, Progressive pollsters, Progressive consultants, Progressive lawyers, Progressive academics and Progressives generally to institutionalize Critical Primary Theory.
Critical Primary Theory is: A political movement with the singular purpose of deposing political parties from their position in the nomination process and replacing political parties with primary “elections”.
GASLIGHTING REPUBLICANS is an ongoing effort to educate Republican convention delegates who believe that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution protect their right to nominate candidates for public office without government interference.
Convention delegates equipped with a complete understanding of their rights, duties responsibilities and authority can save the Republican Party from the Progressives!
While it cannot be disputed that the delegates to the Republican National Convention owns the EXCLUSIVE RIGHT to nominate the Republican candidate for President, the incessant Progressive GASLIGHTING continues to reinforce the “conventional wisdom” that the “will of the voters” supersedes the RIGHTS of members of the Republican Party.
To that end, the complicit media coverage of the 2024 Republican presidential nomination primary CONSPIRACY indicates that ONLY THE COURTS CAN SAVE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
Civil Rights litigation is available to save the Republican Party from the Progressives!
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
"Section 1983 Litigation" refers to lawsuits brought under Section 1983 (Civil action for deprivation of rights) of Title 42 of the United States Code (42 U.S.C. § 1983). Section 1983 provides an individual the right to sue state government employees and others acting "under color of state law" for civil rights violations. Section 1983 does not provide civil rights; it is a means to enforce civil rights that already exist.
Republicans interested in preserving their civil rights should be aware of their options.
This Pro Se form may be one of those options.